Tetzave: Every Jew Counts
Change of Attire
Priestly Vestments

Eight Vestments, Eight Sins
- The priestly tunic atoned for the sin of murder. When the body is killed the soul is robbed of its tunic. A murderer who saw the Kohen wear the priestly tunic was reminded of his sin and was inspired to repent. (5)
- The priestly pants were designed to conceal the “flesh of nakedness,” and were made of linen. The Hebrew word for linen, bud, also means isolation. Accordingly, the pants atoned for the sin of adultery, which is often performed in nakedness and in private.
-
- The priestly turban was worn by the high priest and, like a crown, it indicated a position of prestige. For the Kohen, however, this was not an arrogant position of personal prestige, but a humble position of G-dly prestige. The turban therefore atoned for the sin of arrogance.
-
- The priestly belt was designed to be thirty-two cubits long and was wound around the priest’s waist, between his heart and lower body. The Hebrew word for heart, lev, has a numerical value of thirty-two. The length of the belt and its position on the priest’s body indicate that it atoned for the sin of lustful thoughts. (6)
-
- When the nation was faced with questions such as the advisability of going to war, the question was addressed to the high priest and the array of letters inscribed upon his breastplate would illuminate the divine response. The priestly breastplate, which revealed the divine law, atoned for the sin of perverting the law of justice. (7)
-
- The priestly apron was contrasted with idolatry by the prophet Hosea and was similar in design to aprons worn by pagan priests. The apron therefore atoned for the sin of idolatry. (8)
-
- The apron robe was designed with bells hanging from the bottom that would clang as the high priest walked the corridors of the temple. The robe’s clanging bells atoned for the clanging sounds of sinful gossip and slander.
-
- The forehead plate, as its name indicates, was worn high on the priest’s forehead. The forehead plate therefore atoned for the sin of high-minded and shameless impudence.
True Representation
Footnotes
- Exodus 28: 35 and 43. See Rashi (R. Shlomo Yitzchaki, Troyes France, 1040-1105) and Ramban (Nachmanides, R. Moshe Ben Nachman, Spain, 1194-1270) on Exodus 35: 23.
- Bab Talmud, Zevachim, p. 17b, and Sanhedrin, p. 83b.
- See Tiferet Yonatan (R. Yonasan Eibescutz, Prague, 1690-1764) on Exodus 28: 2. See also Lekutei Sichos (R. Menachem M Schneerson, Rebbe of Lubavitch, NY, 1902-1994), vol. 16, pp. 336.
- Bab. Talmud Erkin, p. 16a. For further explanation on the relationship between the vestments and the sins for which they atoned, see Kli Yakar (R. Ephraim Shlomo of Luntshitz, 1550-1619) on Exodus 28: 39. See also Toras Moshe (R. Moshe Alshich, Tzefat, 1508-1600) on Exodus 28: 30-35.
- Kli Yakar explains that the tunic was made of linen and linen is made from flax, which grows from flaxseed. Flax is the crop planted by Kain, the world’s first murderer. He further explains that the Hebrew word for linen is shet,which also means six. This is why there were six cities of refuge in Israel for Jews who murdered inadvertently. The Talmud (Erkin, 16a) refers to the fact that Joseph’s brothers dipped his tunic in blood to convince their father Jacob that he had been mauled to death. In his commentary to the Talmud, Rashi explains that their choice of tunic was fortuitous. It indicated that in the future the tunic would atone for the sin of murder.
- Kli Yakar adds that lustful thoughts cling to the soul like a belt clings to the body. We regret and repent for the sins that we commit in action, but sins that are committed in the heart are hardly noticed and rarely regretted.
- See Bab. Talmud, Brachot, p. 3b, and Yuma, p. 73a. See also Jerusalem Talmud, Yuma 6: 3 and the explanation by Torah Temimah (R. Baruch HaLevi Epstein, Pinsk, 1860-1941) on Exodus 28: 30.
- The prophet Hosea (Hosea 3: 4) spoke of the long exile that awaited the Jewish people. During this time he prophesied that Jews would have no priestly apron, which the commentators understood as divine instruction, and no idol worship. See also Tiferet Yonatan on Exodus 28: 6.
- For a beautiful explanation on why these particular sins were chosen to be represented by the vestments, see Toras Moshe (R. Moshe Alshich, Tzefat, 1508-1600) on Exodus 28: 4.
Tags: priestly vestments, unity